Colorado can be a gamechanger in regulating GLP-1 weight loss drugs

By Nancy Glick, Director of Food and Nutrition Policy, seen in Colorado Politics  

“As goes California, so goes the nation” is a phrase reflecting California’s reputation as a bellwether in setting regulations that often become a precedent for national policy.

Now, Colorado can play this role, setting new safety standards that will protect 1.4 million Coloradans with obesity from harm if they take a GLP-1 weight loss drug.

The opportunity at hand is SB066, proposed legislation under consideration in the Colorado state Senate that, if enacted into law, could be a gamechanger for consumers. This is because the bill would put stringent guardrails on the manufacture and sale of unapproved compounded GLP-1 drugs the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warns could cause serious harm due to dosing errors and reactions to harmful ingredients. Underscoring the potential health consequences for patients,

as of Sept. 9, 2025, the FDA has received 1,424 reports of adverse events associated with compounded GLP-1 drugs, including reports of hundreds of hospitalizations and 23 deaths.

Understanding what brought us to this point is helpful to appreciate the significance of SB066 in solving the problem. Currently, FDA regulates compounded drugs as one-of-a-kind medications modified when a person needs a different form or dosage. This is the primary purpose for a compounded drug, which is why these drugs are not FDA-approved and why the agency exempts licensed compounding pharmacies from meeting rigorous safety standards required for other prescription medicines, such as clinical testing and labeling with risk information.

Yet these exemptions also apply when compounders mass produce modified drugs to fill a supply gap during a shortage, meaning sellers can take advantage of regulatory loopholes to make massive profits. This was the case between 2022 and early 2025 when there was a shortage of the GLP-1 drugs semaglutide and tirzepatide. Because booming consumer demand for GLP-1s was a primary reason for the shortages, it was a gold rush situation for compounders who made full use of regulatory gaps to build a large secondary market for their compounded GLP-1s by advertising the benefits without disclosing the risks.

The shortage also highlighted the problem the active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) used by compounders often come from China, where quality standards vary widely and the API may go uninspected. According to a Brookings Institution report, fewer than one-quarter of Chinese facilities marketing bulk semaglutide have been inspected by the FDA, despite significant shipments to the U.S.

Yet, consumers were not aware of these safety concerns, they believed the advertising claims, and profits soared. Thus, despite FDA announcing the end of the GLP-1 drug shortage in March 2025 and setting May 22 as the last day when compounded versions could be sold, the large-scale production of compounded GLP-1s continues unabated. Moreover, now, the market features “personalized” formulations with added vitamins or microdoses of GLP-1s that have never been evaluated as well as patches, gummies and drops that are not actual GLP-1 products.

The good news is the FDA is starting to remove questionable active ingredients from the GLP-1 market and is cracking down on telehealth companies making false and misleading advertising claims. Similarly, the U.S. Congress is considering legislation to strengthen FDA oversight, close regulatory loopholes and require reforms that will protect consumers from misinformation and inferior products.

Yet states are equal partners with FDA when it comes to compounding practices and can regulate drug compounding to tighten state controls and impose new oversight measures. For this reason, SB066 can be the change agent at the state level that will protect consumers and safeguard patient safety.

Of special importance to the National Consumers League, the bill would prohibit false and misleading advertising of compounded GLP-1s; compel labels that clearly list all ingredients, their quantities, and their country of origin; require a warning the medication is not FDA-approved; and ensure patients receive information about risks and side effects. Additionally, SB066 addresses safety concerns about the source of the API in compounded GLP-1s by setting strict standards for how the ingredients are manufactured, including the facilities where the medications are made must be registered with and inspected by the FDA.

All of these provisions are “must-haves” that will have a meaningful effect for Coloradans and the public at large.

Nancy Glick is director of Food and Nutrition Policy for the National Consumers League, a position she has held since September 2020.

New Report: 340B Cancer Hospitals More Likely to Pursue Aggressive Medical Debt Collection

Media Contact: Lisa McDonald, Vice President of Communications | 202-207-2829

Washington, DC – A new analysis from the National Consumers League (NCL) finds that hospitals participating in the federal 340B Drug Pricing Program—including many hospitals that treat high volumes of cancer patients —are more likely than non-340B hospitals to permit aggressive medical debt collection practices such as lawsuits, wage garnishment, liens, and credit reporting.

The data show that 75% of 340B hospitals allow legal action against patients, compared with 62% of non-340B hospitals.

“Our report highlights a troubling reality for Americans facing cancer,” said Lisa Bercu, NCL’s Senior Director of Health Policy. “Hospitals meant to support vulnerable patients are, in many cases, pursuing legal action against them. No one should be forced to choose between survival and financial ruin.”

Medical debt is widespread and damaging. Nearly half of U.S. adults report having medical debt, and cancer patients with debt are three times more likely to delay recommended screenings—jeopardizing their health outcomes.

“After cancer treatment, I drained savings, used work bonuses, launched a GoFundMe, and withdrew from my 401(k),” said Dr. Garrina Ross, metastatic breast cancer thriver and Tigerlily ANGEL Advocate. “Bills went to collections, damaged my credit, and made it difficult to secure housing. Patients should not face financial devastation while hospitals benefit from federal drug discounts tied to their care.”

The analysis reviewed 2,500 hospitals nationwide using data from the Lown Institute, CMS, HRSA, and national claims databases. Among hospitals treating the highest volumes of cancer patients (top 10% nationally), 340B hospitals were consistently more likely than non-340B hospitals to maintain policies permitting aggressive debt collection.

“These findings raise serious questions about whether 340B savings are consistently reaching the patients the program was designed to protect,” Bercu added. “Patients with cancer should not face lawsuits and wage garnishment while hospitals benefit from federal drug discounts.”

As policymakers debate the future of the 340B program, NCL urges stronger accountability measures to ensure patients meaningfully benefit from the program and that hospitals receiving drug discounts do not engage in aggressive debt collection against the very patients the program is intended to support.

Policy Recommendations
  • Strengthen and enforce charity care requirements for 340B hospitals
  • Prohibit aggressive debt practices, including denial of care due to existing medical debt
  • Expand financial assistance screening and transparent billing
  • Exclude medical debt from credit reporting decisions
  • Prohibit transfer of spousal medical debt
  • Support Medicaid expansion and federally qualified health centers
  • Advance federal and state medical debt relief proposals
The full report and recommendations are available here.
###
About the National Consumers League (NCL)
Founded in 1899, the National Consumers League is America’s pioneer consumer organization, dedicated to protecting and promoting social and economic justice for consumers and workers in the United States and abroad. Learn more at www.nclnet.org.

Top Ten Scams Report: Phishing and Spoofing Scams Nearly Double in 2025 as AI-Powered Fraud Surges

Media Contact: Lisa McDonald, Vice President of Communications, 202-207-2829 

Washington, DC – Phishing and spoofing scams soared by 85.6% over the past year, doubling median losses from $1,000 to $2,060, according to the National Consumers League’s Fraud.org Top Ten Scams of 2025 report. Of 1,376 consumer complaints analyzed, investment scams caused the highest median loss at $30,000. 

“Given widespread evidence that scammers are increasingly using artificial intelligence tools to craft better pitches, the rise in phishing complaints is particularly concerning,” said NCL Vice President of Public Policy, Telecommunications, and Fraud John Breyault. “AI enables criminals to quickly generate highly realistic phishing emails and clone voices, making scams more convincing and allowing them to reach more targets than before. This underscores the need for consumers to verify information before trusting it.” 

The changing landscape is evident in attack methods as well. In a dramatic shift, web-based contact has overtaken phone scams as the primary attack vector, with 48% of victims reporting their first interaction with scammers occurred online—marking the end of the robocall era’s dominance.  

The Top Ten Scams categories reported to Fraud.org in 2025 were:    

  • Phishing/Spoofing
    Emails pretending to be from a well-known source ask consumers to enter or confirm personal information. 
  • Internet: General Merchandise
    Goods purchased are either never delivered or misrepresented. 
  • Prizes/Sweepstakes/Free Gifts
    Requests for payment to claim fictitious prizes, lottery winnings, or gifts. 
  • Investment: Other (including cryptocurrency)
    Consumers are tricked into paying money for bogus cryptocurrency investments. 
  • Advance Fee Loans, Credit Arrangers
    False promises of business or personal loans, even if credit is bad, for a fee upfront. 
  • Fake Check Scams
    Consumers are asked to cash fraudulent checks and then send the proceeds to a scammer before the check clears. 
  • Friendship & Sweetheart Swindles
    A con artist nurtures an online relationship, builds trust, and convinces victims to send money. 
  • Family/Friend Imposters
    A scammer calls or emails, claiming that a friend or family member is in distress (in jail, in the hospital, etc.) and urgently needs funds to help. 
  • Home Repair
    Fraud involving contractors or repair services that take payment upfront, perform poor or no work, or disappear before completing promised repairs. 
  • Credit Repair
    Fraud involving companies that promise to fix or improve credit scores for a fee, often using illegal or misleading tactics and failing to deliver real results. 

The National Consumers League’s Top Ten Scams report analyzes 1,376 complaints submitted to Fraud.org in 2025. These complaints are self-reported and do not constitute a nationally representative sample of fraud victims. NCL shares complaint data with a network of law enforcement and consumer protection partners, who combine it with other data sources to identify fraud trends and support enforcement actions.  

### 

About the National Consumers League (NCL)      

The National Consumers League, founded in 1899, is America’s pioneer consumer organization. Our mission is to protect and promote social and economic justice for consumers and workers in the United States and abroad. For more information, visit www.nclnet.org.