NCL applauds proposed FTC rules on MLM and other business opportunities

Media Contact: Lisa McDonald, Vice President of Communications, (202) 207-2829 

Washington, DC – Yesterday, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) proposed new and updated rules to combat deceptive earnings claims in the multi-level marketing (MLM) industry and, relatedly, business coaching and investment offers. NCL supports the FTC’s rulemakings and urges the incoming Trump Administration to see the initiatives finalized. 

“Working to keep Americans from being ripped-off is a bipartisan issue,” said NCL Vice President John Breyault. “We are glad the FTC is stepping up to protect individuals from being led into debt traps with false promises. The incoming Trump Administration should finalize these rules and bring an end to these unfair and deceptive business practices.” 

When the FTC voted to begin its rulemaking on earnings claims in 2022, the rulemaking moved forward on a bipartisan, 4-0 vote. The 2022 vote to review the Business Opportunity Rule was also a bipartisan, 4-0 vote. Without finalized rules, it is harder for the FTC to secure financial compensation for victims of deceptive MLMs and other similar firms. 

NCL’s joint comments with Consumer Federation of America in response to the 2022 advanced notice of proposed rulemaking on earnings claims can be found here. 

### 

About the National Consumers League (NCL)  

The National Consumers League, founded in 1899, is America’s pioneer consumer organization. Our mission is to protect and promote social and economic justice for consumers and workers in the United States and abroad. For more information, visit www.nclnet.org. 

NCL applauds FDA for taking action on front-of-package nutrition labeling

Media Contact: Lisa McDonald, Vice President of Communications, (202) 207-2829

Washington, DC – On behalf of the nation’s consumers who are looking for better information to make healthier food purchases, the National Consumers League (NCL) applauds the Food and Drug Administration for issuing a proposed rule to require a standardized front-of-package (FOP) nutrition label on most packaged foods.

Intended to provide accessible, at-a-glance information when consumers are choosing what foods and beverage products to buy, the proposed FOP nutrition label, in the form of a “Nutrition Info” box, would prominently disclose whether the food/beverage contains high, medium or low amounts of saturated fat, sodium and added sugars per serving. As such, consumers will have a new tool to reduce their consumption of these nutrients and thereby lower their risk for obesity and diet-related chronic diseases that are responsible for a million deaths each year.

NCL, along with many consumer, nutrition and public health organizations, have been pressing for FOP nutrition labeling for decades, based on the experiences in 16 other countries where this front-of-package information has been successful in influencing healthier food purchasing decisions.

Now that the rule has been published, NCL urges the incoming Trump Administration to finalize this important rulemaking in the public interest. Taking this step would be an important way to make America healthy, a goal of the Trump Administration.

NCL has been at the forefront of food safety since 1899 and remains dedicated to advocating for clear food labels to help consumers make informed decisions. We believe in clear, truthful, and comprehensive food labeling, including ingredients, nutritional information, and any potential allergens. Our more than 125 years of advocacy have helped shape numerous historic policies and regulations that govern food safety and labeling today.

Below is an example of a FOP food label:

###

About the National Consumers League (NCL) 

The National Consumers League, founded in 1899, is America’s pioneer consumer organization. Our mission is to protect and promote social and economic justice for consumers and workers in the United States and abroad. For more information, visit www.nclnet.org.

Statement on the need for the CMS Rule on Coverage of Obesity Medications

Media contact: National Consumers League – Lisa McDonald, lisam@nclnet.org, 202-207-2829

Washington, DC – We, the undersigned organizations, are enthusiastically supportive of the proposed rule by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to align coverage policy to reflect the prevailing medical consensus that obesity is a chronic disease. We urge the incoming administration to finalize this policy through the rulemaking process. By extending access to obesity medications for people living with obesity who lack access to comprehensive evidence-based care in Medicare and Medicaid, the proposed CMS rule would address an urgent health crisis and leading contributor to the “Unhealth” of Americans. If action is not taken, the total number of adults with overweight or obesity will reach 213 million. To achieve making America healthier, obesity must be addressed, treated and managed effectively.

Medicare Part D’s prohibition of coverage for “weight loss” medications is a major barrier for older Americans and those living with disabilities, and many dual eligible beneficiaries, to receiving medically necessary, safe, and effective FDA-approved pharmacotherapy to treat obesity. Medicare’s current categorization and restriction is outdated. It does not align with current medical evidence, standards of care or the understanding of the disease.

The CMS proposed rule would require coverage for obesity medications under Medicare and Medicaid by acknowledging obesity as a chronic condition. We wholeheartedly agree with the rule’s proposal to reinterpret these medications for the treatment of obesity, that would provide coverage under Medicare and Medicaid.

Obesity is a treatable chronic disease that plays a major factor in many other conditions such as type 2 diabetes, hypertension, heart disease, fatty liver disease, kidney disease, lipid disorders, certain cancers, sleep apnea, arthritis, and mental illness. The treatment of obesity requires a comprehensive approach including administering intensive behavioral therapy (IBT) and bariatric surgery under Medicare Part B and providing Medicare Part D coverage for Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved obesity medications.

The obesity epidemic has had a negative impact on our nation’s health and economy. Among older adults (aged 60+), the prevalence of obesity is 42.8 percent, similar to the level among younger and middle-aged adults. More than 20 percent of the population will be 65 years of age or older by 2030, up from 15 percent today, highlighting the importance of addressing obesity among older Americans. Among Medicaid beneficiaries, the prevalence of obesity is 38 percent, while the prevalence of overweight and obesity is 70 percent among Medicaid adults.

Without treatment Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries with obesity risk further health deterioration and an increased likelihood in the onset of complications including obesityrelated cancers, type 2 diabetes, and end stage renal disease. Additionally, people with
severe obesity have a 48 percent higher risk of physical injury including falls which lead to higher costs and mortality rates.

The new administration must take action to address this crisis, by allowing Medicare and Medicaid to offer comprehensive obesity care for the millions of Americans who need these services and treatments. This action would improve the health of individuals before they enter the Medicare program, thereby supporting better health and reducing long-term costs.

A Philip Randolph Institute
Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Alliance for Aging Research
Alliance for Patient Access
Alliance for Women’s Health and Prevention
American Academy of Physician Associates
American Association of Clinical Endocrinology
American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
American Diabetes Association
American Gastroenterological Association
American Kidney Fund
American Liver Foundation
American Medical Women’s Association
American Psychological Association Services
American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery
American Society for Nutrition
Association of Diabetes Care & Education Specialists
Bone Health & Osteoporosis Foundation
California Black Health Network
California Chronic Care Coalition
CancerCare
Caregiver Action Network
Center for Patient Advocacy Leaders (CPALs)
Choose Healthy Life
Chronic Care Policy Alliance
Color of Gastrointestinal Illnesses
ConscienHealth
Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation
DCM Foundation
Diabetes Leadership Council
Diabetes Patient Advocacy Coalition
Endocrine Society
Fatty Liver Foundation
Gerontological Society of America
Global Liver Institute
HealthyWomen
ICAN, International Cancer Advocacy Network
League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC)
Liver Coalition of San Diego
Looms For Lupus
Lupus and Allied Diseases Association, Inc.
Lupus Foundation of America
MacDonald Center for Nutrition Education and Research
MANA, A National Latina Organization
Michigan Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Missouri Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics
Missouri Psychological Association
Movement is Life
National Alliance for Caregiving
National Asian Pacific Center on Aging (NAPCA)
National Association of Hispanic Nurses
National Black Nurses Association, Inc
National Caucus and Center on Black Aging
National Consumers League
National Council on Aging
National Hispanic Council on Aging
National Hispanic Health Foundation
National Hispanic Medical Association
National Kidney Foundation
National Psoriasis Foundation
Nevada Chronic Care Collaborative
Obesity Action Coalition
Obesity Care Advocacy Network
Obesity Medicine Association
PAs in Obesity Medicine
RetireSafe
Society for Women’s Health Research
Society of Behavioral Medicine
STOP Obesity Alliance
The American Society for Preventive Cardiology
The Mended Hearts, Inc.
The Obesity Society
WomenHeart
YMCA of the USA

###

About the National Consumers League (NCL) 

The National Consumers League, founded in 1899, is America’s pioneer consumer organization. Our mission is to protect and promote social and economic justice for consumers and workers in the United States and abroad. For more information, visit www.nclnet.org.

NCL commends CFPB’s rule to eliminate medical debt from credit reports

The National Consumer Law Center and a coalition of other leading consumer-focused organizations, including the National Consumers League, released the following press statement on January 7, 2025.

Sally Greenberg, NCL’s CEO, said “The magnitude of medical debt in America is crippling:100 million Americans carry medical debt that is not caused by profligate spending, but often by medical emergencies. Thus, punishing Americans who carry this debt by harming their credit scores, forcing them to turn to predatory lending if they need a car or home loan multiplies the harm. The CFPB’s rule stopping credit reporting agencies from sharing medical debt with lenders will prevent adding to the burden of the 15 million Americans with lowered credit scores due to medical debt. NCL supports this important rule.”

January 7, 2025 — Press Release

15 Million Americans Will See Credit Scores Improve 

Washington, DC– Today, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) finalized a rule to stop the harmful impact of medical debt on consumers’ credit scores. The rule will stop credit reporting companies from sharing medical debts with lenders and prohibit lenders from making lending decisions based on existing medical debt.

“Medical debt has damaged the financial record of tens of millions for far too long, causing credit rejections and pushing costs even higher for Americans struggling financially,” said Chi Chi Wu, senior attorney at the National Consumer Law Center. “The CFPB continues with its impressive record of protecting consumers, providing critical relief to the 15 million Americans with unjustly lowered credit scores due to medical debt.”

Even though medical debt has minimal predictive value in forecasting about whether people will pay their loan payments, vast amounts of medical debt information remains in the credit reporting system. Medical debt unjustly damages the credit scores of millions, limiting their ability to obtain affordable credit, rent safe housing, or even get a job. It also assists debt collectors in seeking to coerce payments, including for inaccurate or false medical bills.

The big three credit reporting agencies (Equifax, Transunion, Experian) voluntarily removed some medical collections information starting in 2022, but in 2024 the CFPB found that 15 million Americans still had more than $49 billion in outstanding medical debt on their credit reports. Consumers left behind by industry efforts were more likely to live in the South and in predominantly Black and Latino/Hispanic neighborhoods.

“Today’s medical debt rule will lessen the financial burdens for all households, but particularly for Black and Latine families, who carry more medical debt due to decades of intentionally racist policies and practices across health care, employment,housing, education, and financial services,” said Amanda N. Jackson, consumer campaign director for Americans for Financial Reform. “A good credit score is critical for participating in the U.S. economy, and this rule will continue to help lessen the negative credit impacts of medical debt.”

This rule is part of a larger initiative by the CFPB to address hidden junk fees charged by banks and financial companies that disproportionately impact low-income consumers. Since its formation, the CFPB has obtained over $21 billion in relief for over 205 million people. Despite its success and its popularity with the public, the agency’s future is at risk. Most recently, advisors to the President-elect have called for the CFPB to be shuttered. The medical debt credit reporting rule itself could also be overturned by Congress using the Congressional Review Act (CRA), which allows Congress, with the President’s signature, to overturn new regulations.

“The medical debt rule shows how important the CFPB is to working people who are losing ground to corporate profiteering,” said Lauren Saunders, associate director at NCLC. “Working class folks must speak up to ensure the CFPB’s rule to limit medical debts on credit reports, and the CFPB itself, survive attacks by corporate America.”

The final rule does not apply to medical debts on credit cards, including specialized credit cards, which advocates had urged the CFPB to include. It also does not apply to credit reports used for non-lending purposes, such as employment and tenant screening

“Medical debt shouldn’t harm credit records regardless of how it shows up,” said April Kuehnhoff, senior attorney at NCLC. “And it shouldn’t damage the ability of Americans to get a job or an apartment.”

Additional Quotes

“When banking gets mixed up with health care, it causes a lot of heartache,” said Adam Rust, director of financial services for the Consumer Federation of America. “The CFPB’s new rule places a sensible boundary between the two. People often pay medical debt they know they do not owe to protect their credit scores. Others avoid seeking medical care, fearing it will harm their creditworthiness. The new rule means that medical debt collectors cannot weaponize the credit reporting system to their advantage, and sick people will not forego treatment just because they want to borrow money in the future.”

“The crushing financial burdens of medical debt should not continue to undermine people’s ability to take out a loan or qualify for a mortgage,” said Christine Chen Zinner, senior policy counsel at Americans for Financial Reform. “While today’s rule will help over 100 million people saddled with medical debt, this rule will critically lessen the negative credit impacts stemming from decades of racist housing, employment, healthcare, and other policies and practices that have left Black and Latine households with higher amounts of medical debt.”

“With this rule requiring removal of medical bills from credit reports, the CFPB protects millions of medical debt-strapped Americans from certain additional financial struggles triggered by the archaic credit reporting system,” said Christine Hines, senior policy director at the National Association of Consumer Advocates.

“Finalizing this rule is a big win for Mainers and people all over the country,” said Nora Flaherty-Stanford of Maine People’s Alliance. “More than 40% of Mainers say they’ve taken on medical debt in the last five years, and for most of them, it’s still hanging over their heads. We all know that’s not right, and as we celebrate this good news, we’re calling on our members of Congress to stand strong in supporting this rule and the CFPB.”

“Someone’s history of unexpected medical debt has no correlation with their willingness or ability to repay future bills, so it should have no bearing on a person’s access to credit, an apartment or a job,” says Ruth Susswein, Consumer Action’s director of consumer protection.

“Medical debt burdens millions of families across the country and can unfairly tarnish a person’s credit record, making it more difficult to qualify for an affordable loan, get a job, or even rent an apartment,” said Chuck Bell, advocacy program director for Consumer Reports. “Many consumers have medical debt on their credit reports that is inaccurate or under dispute because our medical billing and insurance reimbursement system is so complex and confusing. No one’s credit record should be ruined by medical debt since it’s not a reliable predictor of credit risk. The CFPB’s ban on medical debt reporting provides critical protection to consumers and will help ensure they can get the health care they need without fearing that their credit record will be damaged beyond repair.

“This new rule is good news for at least 14 million people – including financially responsible families that have accumulated medical debt from unpredictable health issues, high out-of-pocket costs, insurance claim denials and billing errors,” said Patricia Kelmar, senior director of health care campaigns for U.S. PIRG. “We’ve known for years that medical debt is not predictive of credit-worthiness. The new rule builds on the CFPB’s important work on medical debt reporting and is yet another example of how the CFPB protects consumers from unfair practices.”

“Banning the reporting of medical debt will end the weaponization of credit reporting against those who are unlucky enough to get sick or injured and run up bills they cannot afford to pay,” said Renée Steinhagen, executive director, New Jersey Appleseed Public Interest Law Center and a member of the NJ for Healthcare Coalition. “Thanks to the new CFPB rule, they need no longer worry about their credit being ruined, which can make it harder to buy or rent a home or a car or even interfere with getting a job.”

“One in five New Jerseyans struggle with repaying medical debt,” said Beverly Brown Ruggia, Financial Justice Program director at New Jersey Citizen Action. “In a nation where good credit is essential for accessing housing, employment, and even medical care itself, it is unconscionable that anyone should face financial ruin and lose access to these basic necessities simply because they or a family member got sick. With this rule, the CFPB has stepped in once again to protect the most vulnerable among us from unfair treatment and potential financial devastation.”

“This landmark rule ensures consumers are no longer unfairly penalized for medical debt,” said Jennifer Holloway, staff attorney leading the Medical Debt Project at Tzedek DC. “By removing medical debt from credit reports, the CFPB helps individuals and families access housing, employment, and credit opportunities and advances racial and disability justice. This rule recognizes that access to medical care should not result in lifelong financial setbacks and will improve patients’ well-being by reducing stress and anxiety. Ultimately, this is a vital step toward supporting healthier and more financially secure communities.”

“The magnitude of medical debt in America is crippling:100 million Americans carry medical debt that is not caused by profligate spending, but often by medical emergencies. Thus punishing Americans who carry this debt by harming their credit scores, forcing them to turn to predatory lending if they need a car or home loan multiplies the harm,” said Sally Greenberg, chief executive officer at National Consumer League. “The CFPB’s rule stopping credit reporting agencies from sharing medical debt with lenders will prevent adding to the burden of the 15 million Americans with lowered credit scores due to medical debt. NCL supports this important rule.”

“This rule is a significant win for struggling Maryland families,” said Marceline White, executive director of Economic Action Maryland Fund (Economic Action). “More than 876,000 Maryland households have a medical debt they are unable to repay. No one should have their credit downgraded because they or a loved one fell ill and sought medical care.” 

“NALCAB – the National Association for Latino Community Asset Builders applauds the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)’s final rule banning medical debt from credit reports. According to a report by the Urban Institute, adults who live in communities where the majority of the population are people of color are more likely to have medical debt in collections reported on their credit reports.  Today’s announcement will help boost the economic trajectory of Latinos and therefore further stimulate economic growth,” said Clarinda Landeros, Director of Public Policy, NALCAB. 

“As we work to create a country where healthcare is a human right, we must eliminate the many burdens of a healthcare system that puts profit over people,” said Katie Goldstein, Director of Housing and Healthcare Campaigns at Popular Democracy. “Too often, our people risk financial ruin when they seek medical care due to high costs and long term medical debt that impacts credit ratings and makes it more difficult to secure housing and employment. By eliminating medical debt from credit scores, today’s much-needed CFPB ruling will ease some of these barriers, will protect folks from predatory debt collectors, and will encourage more people to seek medical care with less fear of financial repercussions.”

“The National Fair Housing Alliance applauds the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)’s final rule banning medical debt from credit reports,” said Nikitra Bailey, executive vice president of the National Fair Housing Alliance. “Medical debt devastates the budgets of millions of families, especially those living in the South making it difficult for people living in the region to secure quality credit opportunities to purchase a home, start a business, or finance a car to get to work. It also disproportionately impacts Black and Latino consumers who are more likely to lack wealth to immediately address surprise medical expenses because they were long denied fair housing and lending opportunities. These medical debts can then result in collections reported on their credit reports, although the medical debits are not an accurate reflection of the consumer’s ability or willingness to repay debts. The CFPB’s final rule will help provide a more equitable path to access to credit and therefore further stimulate economic growth, especially in the South.”

“It surprises Alaskans when health insurance fails to protect them from the extremely high costs of healthcare in our state,” explained Claire Lubke, economic justice lead at Alaska Public Interest Research Group. “All it takes is an accidental visit to an out-of-network provider and we end up in a situation where 40% of Alaskans are holding medical debt, including military members and those with access to tribal health services. Allowing medical debt on credit reports punishes Alaskans for receiving medical care they need and often don’t realize is uncovered until it’s too late. AKPIRG commends the CFPB for improving access to necessary financial services for Alaskans who are working hard to overcome medical debt.”

“Medical debt often stems from unpredictable, unavoidable circumstances and shouldn’t stop access to financial opportunities. In Oregon, 30% of residents have incurred medical debt in the last two years. Of those residents, 85% report significant impacts, from increased stress and anxiety to financial hardship and delayed medical care. Oregon Consumer Justice applauds the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau for finalizing this vital rule addressing medical debt on credit reports,” says Jagjit Nagra, executive director of Oregon Consumer Justice. “This rule is a critical first step in protecting consumers and promoting financial equity. In Oregon’s upcoming legislative session, we look forward to championing legislation that will further extend this rule’s impacts to exclude medical debt in employment and tenant screening and medical debt incurred using medical credit cards.”

“This rule not only relieves patients and their loved ones from the financial burden of medical debt on their credit reports, but also relieves them from the real and harmful physical and mental impacts of medical debt on their health,” said David Zhao, Equal Justice Works Fellow, sponsored by Amgen Inc. and Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, at Public Counsel. “In Los Angeles, one in ten adults is substantially burdened by medical debt, leading them to be 2-3.5 times more likely to be food insecure, forgo prescriptions, and be unstably housed. Under the CFPB’s new rule, patients can break the cycle of delaying further medical care due to the stress and anxiety of having their medical bills show up on their credit reports.”

Related Resources

###

About the National Consumers League (NCL) 

The National Consumers League, founded in 1899, is America’s pioneer consumer organization. Our mission is to protect and promote social and economic justice for consumers and workers in the United States and abroad. For more information, visit www.nclnet.org.

NCL’s latest podcast highlights the disparities with the 340B drug pricing program

January 6, 2025

Media contact: National Consumers League – Lisa McDonald, lisam@nclnet.org, 202-207-2829

Washington, DC – The National Consumer League (NCL) has released a new episode of its We Can Do This podcast, shedding light on the inequities and lack of transparency surrounding the 340B Drug Pricing Program. This federal initiative was designed to provide medications at reduced prices to low-income patients, but it has been manipulated by large healthcare entities to generate billions in profits with minimal oversight. As a result, the program’s intended beneficiaries—low-income patients—are often forced to pay full price for medications they cannot afford.

In this episode, NCL’s CEO Sally Greenberg is joined by Amy Hinojosa, President and CEO of MANA, a National Latina Organization, and founding member of the Health Equity Collaborative, and Dr. Ge Bai, an expert on healthcare accounting, finance, and policy at Johns Hopkins University about the shocking lack of transparency around a program that has more than doubled in cost to taxpayers reaching more than $120 Billion in 2022. Both experts emphasize the importance of accountability to ensure that the 340B program truly benefits those it was designed to serve.

“The 340B program was created as a ‘buy-low-sell-low’ initiative. But over the years, it has evolved into a ‘buy-low-sell-high’ program,” said Dr. Ge Bai. “Hospitals can still buy drugs at a low price, but when they sell those drugs, they do so at full price—without any discount. This allows hospitals to reap substantial profits from the difference between the discounted purchase price and the high selling price.”

The episode also discusses the bipartisan 340B ACCESS Act (HR 8574), proposed legislation aimed at restoring transparency and accountability to this critical healthcare program.

The 340B Access Act (HR 8574) seeks to:

  • Ensure that discounts directly reduce patient costs
  • Modernize contract pharmacy arrangements
  • Strengthen eligibility requirements
  • Implement public reporting measures
  • Prevent abuse by middlemen

“Entering this new legislative session, there is a real opportunity to leverage bipartisan support and push the 340B ACCESS Act across the finish line,” said NCL CEO Sally Greenberg. “The bottom line is that this program needs stronger guardrails to ensure that everyday Americans—especially those in underserved communities—have access to affordable medications.”

Additional Resources:

Dr. Ge Bai, PhD, CPA, Johns Hopkins University: Do Nonprofit Hospitals Deserve Their Tax Exemption?

340 B State Press Releases

 

###

About the National Consumers League (NCL) 

The National Consumers League, founded in 1899, is America’s pioneer consumer organization. Our mission is to protect and promote social and economic justice for consumers and workers in the United States and abroad. For more information, visit www.nclnet.org.

Statement on the death of President Jimmy Carter from NCL CEO Sally Greenberg

January 1, 2025

The National Consumers League (NCL) extends condolences to the family, friends, and community of former President Jimmy Carter upon his death this week. In addition to being an honest and effective Commander in Chief and humanitarian who expanded access to housing for low-income families through his work on Habitat for Humanity, President Carter should also be remembered as a great consumer champion.

During his presidency, Mr. Carter championed consumer protection in a variety of ways. He appointed labor and consumer champion Esther Peterson, who also served as president of the National Consumers League, to head the White Office of Consumer Affairs. Like President Lyndon Johnson (LBJ)  before him, who first named Peterson to the post of Special Adviser to the President Jimmy Carter understood that consumer rights permeate citizens’ experiences with companies and with government.

Unlike his processor, Mr. Carter gave Mrs. Peterson a staff and access to him personally in the Oval Office. As such, Mr. Carter elevated consumer protection far beyond LBJ’s decree. Along with re-appointing Esther Peterson, Carter issued a historic decree in April of 1978, “Memorandum from the President on Consumer Affairs,” the first of its kind, directing the heads of every government agency to take a series of steps to prioritize consumer protection. 

Notably, Mr. Carter stated that “the Agency for Consumer Advocacy is mainly designed for participation in very large administrative proceedings; it is only one of a number of steps which will better protect the consumer.”

On a personal note, I had the honor of meeting President Carter in 1978, when he appointed my aunt, Geri Joseph, to serve as Ambassador to the Netherlands. I was lucky to be able to attend her swearing-in ceremony in the Oval Office. I found him to be kind and charming; despite a number of pressing matters, he took the time to introduce himself to every member of our family who was gathered for the occasion. 

###

 

 

NCL hails FTC ban on hidden junk fees in ticketing and lodging

December 17, 2024

Media contact: National Consumers League – Lisa McDonald, lisam@nclnet.org, 202-207-2829

Washington, DC – Today, the FTC announced its final rule banning hidden junk fees in live-event ticketing and short-term lodging. NCL has long advocated for such a ban at the federal level and applauds the Commission for enacting this critical consumer protection regulation.

“Sellers in these industries can no longer lie to consumers to make a buck. The FTC’s final rule is a common-sense policy that will make the ticketing and lodging marketplaces fairer for everyone involved,” said NCL Vice President John Breyault. “The price that’s advertised is the price that you should pay.”

This single rule by the FTC will result in billions of dollars in savings for consumers. A non-partisan federal study of the ticketing industry found that primary and secondary ticket sellers charged fees averaging 27% and 31%, respectively, of the ticket’s price. Regarding lodging, the Council of Economic Advisers *estimated that consumers lose $3.3 billion annually to hotel junk fees.

Further reading:

2024 public comments of the National Consumers League and 51 other organizations supporting the FTC’s proposed rule to ban junk fees

2024 public comments of the Break Up Ticketmaster Coalition (NCL and 14 other organizations) supporting the FTC’s proposed rule

2023 testimony of NCL’s CEO before the United States Senate on the need to prohibit junk fees

2023 public comments of the National Consumers League and 41 other organizations supporting the FTC’s advanced notice of proposed rulemaking on junk fees

2022 public comments of the National Consumers League supporting a petition for rulemaking to ban drip pricing, which resulted in this final rule

2018 public comments of the National Consumers League and the Sports Fans Coalition urging FTC intervention in the ticketing industry

*Links are no longer active as the original sources have removed the content, sometimes due to federal website changes or restructurings

###

About the National Consumers League (NCL) 

The National Consumers League, founded in 1899, is America’s pioneer consumer organization. Our mission is to protect and promote social and economic justice for consumers and workers in the United States and abroad. For more information, visit www.nclnet.org.

NCL calls on Congress to include TICKET Act in continuing resolution

December 16, 2024

National Consumers League Calls on Congress to Include TICKET Act in Continuing Resolution

Contact: National Consumers League – Lisa McDonald, lisam@nclnet.org, 202-207-2829

Washington, DC – The National Consumers League (NCL), America’s oldest consumer and worker advocacy organization, is urging Congress to include the bipartisan TICKET Act (H.R. 3950) in any Continuing Resolution (CR) passed this session. The TICKET Act represents the most significant live event ticketing reform in nearly a decade, addressing key concerns in the live event marketplace for all stakeholders.

Key provisions of the TICKET Act include:

  • Banning hidden fees through all-in pricing requirements.
  • Prohibiting speculative ticketing and other deceptive marketing practices.
  • Requiring refunds for canceled and postponed events.
  • Commissioning an FTC study on enforcement of the BOTS Act.

Earlier this year, the TICKET Act passed the House with overwhelming bipartisan support (388–24) and gained endorsements from a broad coalition of stakeholders, including the, Consumer Reports, Artist Rights Alliance, Recording Academy, Live Nation/Ticketmaster (LNE), Coalition for Ticket Fairness, Vivid Seats, StubHub, and the National Independent Venue Association and other consumer groups.

Despite previously supporting the bill, the Fix the Tix Coalition—has backed away from the bill. We think that is misguided.

“The TICKET Act is a hard-fought compromise and, we believe, Congress’ best chance to deliver meaningful reforms that benefit fans, venues, and artists as early as next summer’s concert season,” said John Breyault, NCL’s Vice President of Public Policy, Telecommunications, and Fraud. “We are disappointed that groups that had previously supported the bill have reversed themselves, though the bill has not significantly changed since they originally endorsed it. We are concerned that Ticketmaster/Live Nation, which owns primary and secondary ticketing platforms, manages hundreds of artists and owns, controls, or has exclusive contracts with hundreds of venues, may be exerting undue influence at the expense of consumers. Congress should resist special interests, and stand up for consumers by including this package of positive reforms in the CR.”

###

NCL calls on FDA to ban Red No. 3 from the food supply

Contact: National Consumers League – Lisa McDonald, lisam@nclnet.org, 202-207-2829

Washington, DC – The National Consumers League (NCL) anxiously awaits FDA’s final action on a citizen petition to ban Red No. 3 from the food supply, something that has been too long in coming. Red No. 3 is a petroleum based color additive known to cause cancer in laboratory animals and is now banned for used in cosmetics and externally applied drugs. Yet, the food dye is still widely used in foods and beverages consumed by children who are more susceptible to the effects of chemicals in foods. The bigger problem is that the FDA has been impeded for years in taking action against additives like Red No. 3 because Congress has not given the agency the same authority as the Environmental Protection Agency has to make safety decisions about chemical safety, nor has it appropriated the funds for the FDA to respond effectively. At a time when more than 10,000 food chemicals are allowed in foods and beverages, it is time for Congress to make food additive safety a priority and give the FDA the authority it needs.

###

About the National Consumers League (NCL) 

The National Consumers League, founded in 1899, is America’s pioneer consumer organization. Our mission is to protect and promote social and economic justice for consumers and workers in the United States and abroad. For more information, visit www.nclnet.org.

NCL applauds CFPB final rule on overdraft fees

December 12, 2024:  NCL Applauds CFPB Final Rule on Overdraft Fees

Contact: National Consumers League – Lisa McDonald, lisam@nclnet.org, 202-207-2829

Washington, DC— Consumers across the U.S. burdened by abusive overdraft fee practices will receive some relief after today’s announcement that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has finalized its overdraft rule. The rule will curb many large banks’ fees from $35 to approximately $5, and is estimated to save American consumers up to $5 billion annually.

The National Consumer League (NCL) applauds the CFPB’s rule as it will prevent big banks and credit unions with more than $10 billion in assets from charging junk overdraft fees that burden families with hundreds of dollars a year in unfair charges and push marginalized communities out of the banking system. The rule will push banks to offer straightforward, affordable forms of coverage protection instead.

“Predatory overdraft fees disproportionately harm communities of color and low-income families, but no one is immune to the damaging effects of these exploitative practices,” says Sally Greenberg NCL’s CEO. “By finalizing its overdraft rule, the CFPB is standing up to big banks, protecting American consumers and their hard-earned money.”

The CFPB’s action to protect consumers provides clear rules of the road to ensure consistency and clarity regarding overdraft products. The final rule requires financial institutions with over $10 billion in assets to choose from one of three options for overdraft fees:

  1. Cap fees at $5 to cover the actual costs to oversee an overdraft program.
  2. Charge fees based on actual costs and losses as a service, rather than a profit center.
  3. Treat overdraft coverage like loans, with disclosures, opt-in options, and payment flexibility.

Read the comments submitted by NCL and 143 organizations submitted in support of this rule here.

###