States Must Step Up if DOJ Sells Out to Live Nation
Washington, DC – Reports of a pending settlement between the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Live Nation Entertainment, the parent company of Ticketmaster, should be deeply concerning to all Americans, including live event fans, legislators, and competitors of the live event monopoly. The following statement is attributable to John Breyault, National Consumers League Vice President of Public Policy, Telecommunications, and Fraud:
“Reports that the U.S. Department of Justice has reached a settlement with Live Nation Entertainment that allows the company to keep its Ticketmaster empire are deeply disappointing for the millions of consumers who have endured years of sky-high fees, botched ticket sales, and a marketplace tilted against fans.
Live Nation has long been the poster child for monopoly power in the live entertainment industry. Through its ownership of Ticketmaster and its dominance in concert promotion and venue management, the company has amassed extraordinary control over the live music ecosystem. This has left fans, artists, and independent venues with nowhere else to turn.
If reports are accurate, the roughly $200 million penalty included in the settlement amounts to little more than a slap on the wrist. For a company of Live Nation’s size, that figure is less than a third of a year’s profits. That is the cost of doing business, not a meaningful penalty. Consumers who have been forced to pay inflated ticket prices and junk fees deserve far more.
Equally troubling are reports that Live Nation hired Trump-connected lobbyists while the case was pending and that senior antitrust officials, including antitrust chief Gail Slater, were pushed out of the DOJ during the litigation. That sequence of events raises fundamental questions about whether the outcome of this case was driven by the public interest or by political influence.
When a company accused of monopoly abuses hires well-connected lobbyists, and suddenly the government’s case collapses into a modest fine, consumers have every right to ask whether justice was truly served.
Allowing Live Nation to keep Ticketmaster without meaningful structural remedies would squander a rare opportunity to restore competition to the live entertainment marketplace. For years, fans have watched ticket prices soar while service fees multiply — a system that advocates say reflects a market where competition has been stifled.
The fight, however, is not over. The states that joined this case did so because they recognized the harm that Live Nation’s conduct has inflicted on fans, artists, and independent venues. If the federal government is unwilling to finish the job, state attorneys general must step up and hold Live Nation accountable for years of anti-competitive and anti-consumer conduct.
The company’s credibility with regulators is already in doubt. In a separate case brought by the Federal Trade Commission, regulators allege that Live Nation Entertainment and its Ticketmaster subsidiary misled consumers and enabled practices that undermined the Better Online Ticket Sales (BOTS) Act, reinforcing concerns that the company has been willing to bend the rules and the truth when dealing with regulators.
Concertgoers deserve a marketplace where competition — not monopoly power — determines the price of a ticket.”
