NCL Submits Comments Supporting FTC Policy Against Personalized Pricing 

Media Contact: Lisa McDonald, Vice President of Communications, 202-207-2829

Washington, DC—On Friday, the National Consumers League, joined by 26 other public interest organizations, submitted comments in response to the Federal Trade commission’s (FTC) proposed policy regarding personalized pricing, also known as surveillance pricing. NCL supported the FTC’s position that failing to disclose personalized pricing likely violates the law. NCL also urged the FTC to hold businesses accountable for uses of personalized pricing that would seriously harm consumers even if disclosed.  

“The idea that businesses can spy on us without limit, and be financially rewarded for the same behavior, is fundamentally repulsive,” said NCL Senior Public Policy Manager Eden Iscil. “Companies need to focus on competing and improving their product rather than invading our privacy.” 

The FTC cited numerous examples in its proposed policy of possible deployments of personalized pricing, such as charging dying rideshare users higher fares if they are being transported to a hospital or raising grocery prices for mothers taking care of multiple children. These specific examples and many others should be prohibited under the law, even if disclosed. In addition to the FTC Act, these and similar uses of personalized pricing likely violate federal and/or state anti-discrimination laws prohibiting prejudice against certain traits, including having a disability, familial status, and other protected classes.  

In drafting the comments, NCL received assistance from the Center for Consumer Law & Economic Justice at the U.C. Berkeley School of Law, which served as counsel, as well as the National Consumer Law Center and Truth in Advertising, Inc.  

The full comments can be found here. 

Further reading: 

###

About the National Consumers League (NCL)      

The National Consumers League, founded in 1899, is America’s pioneer consumer organization. Our mission is to protect and promote social and economic justice for consumers and workers in the United States and abroad. For more information, visit www.nclnet.org.    

Administration’s “Freedom Means Affordable Cars” Initiative is an Assault on Consumers and Common Sense

Media Contact: Lisa McDonald, Vice President of Communications, 202-207-2829

Washington, DC – Today, the Trump administration released a final rule weakening federal fuel economy standards for cars, pickup trucks, and SUVs.  The rule, dubbed “Freedom Means Affordable Cars,” lowers the fleet average fuel economy from 50.4 miles per gallon to 34.9 miles per gallon by model year 2031.

“Today, the Trump administration dealt perhaps its greatest blow to affordability and common sense: gutting federal fuel economy standards in the midst of skyrocketing gasoline prices and an impending energy crisis,” said Daniel Greene, the Senior Director of Consumer Protection & Product Safety.  “A gallon of regular gasoline is nearing $4.50 per gallon.  Diesel prices have never been higher.  Nearly two years of sustained assaults on domestic clean energy and unprecedented weakening of energy efficiency standards have helped get us into this mess.  Doubling down on failed policies that inflict pain at the pump and exacerbate the affordability crisis will not get us out.”

The administration claims the proposed rule will reduce the price of new vehicles and generate tens of billions of dollars in savings for the American people.  The final rule inexplicably projects that regular gasoline will cost less than $3 per gallon from 2026 through 2040.

“Voodoo economics and alternative facts will not make this good policy,” Greene continued. “The administration may be satisfied with the status quo—content to hoist a metaphorical “Mission Accomplished” banner across every gas pump in the nation.  But there is a better path for consumers.  We must ambitiously support clean energy technologies and strengthen fuel economy standards, because costs are low when fuel economy standards are high.  Since 2002, fuel economy improvements save owners of newer pickup trucks and SUVs $9,920 and owners of newer cars $9,100 over the life of the vehicle.  Yet, since 2002, all vehicle equipment upgrades—including changes in fuel economy, comfort, convenience, durability, and voluntary safety improvements—have added just $3,040 to the cost of a vehicle.  No more false choices.  Let’s choose affordability and energy independence, economic vitality, and national security.”

In February, the National Consumers League released Sticker Shock, a report identifying the factors contributing to rising vehicle prices and evaluating the effect on household affordability.

Earlier this month, the National Consumers League and 25 other consumer organizations sent a letter to Congress opposing resolutions that would invalidate robust tailpipe emission standards adopted in full or in part by 18 states and the District of Columbia.

###

About the National Consumers League (NCL)      

The National Consumers League, founded in 1899, is America’s pioneer consumer organization. Our mission is to protect and promote social and economic justice for consumers and workers in the United States and abroad. For more information, visit www.nclnet.org.    

Nancy Glick

The Dangerous Market for Unapproved GLP-1 Medications and Research-Grade Peptides: It’s Time for Social Media Platforms to Step Up

By Nancy Glick, NCL Director of Food and Nutrition Policy

The American frontier between 1865 and 1890 was called the “Wild West” —a vast, untamed region lacking government control, formal infrastructure, and reliable law enforcement. It flourished during the gold rush when outlaws and vigilantes roamed freely.

Now a modern-day Wild West has emerged, fueled by a new gold rush and weak government controls. But instead of sparking gunfights between settlers and cattle herders, this Wild West puts public health at risk by feeding an unregulated online marketplace selling unapproved GLP-1 drugs and other substances that can cause serious harm, even death.

One of the most visible parts of this market is a large exploitative online trade in unapproved compounded GLP-1 weight-loss drugs. It emerged in 2022, when shortages of semaglutide and tirzepatide triggered FDA rules allowing compounding pharmacies to produce “non-identical” versions that were not FDA-approved. Seeing the profit potential, compounders turned inexpensive raw active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) into monthly injectable products, while telehealth companies and other sellers marketed them aggressively as cheaper alternatives with the same safety and efficacy as FDA-approved branded medicines.

By 2024, nearly one in three consumers taking a GLP-1 weight loss drug said they were getting the medicine from a compounding pharmacy. This prompted the National Consumers League to issue a national alert relaying FDA’s warning that compounded GLP-1s are not tested, reviewed, or approved by the FDA and may cause dosing errors or exposure to the wrong ingredients.

A year later, the national shortage of semaglutide and tirzepatide ended, and the FDA gave compounders until May 22, 2025, to stop selling their mass-produced compounded versions. Instead, compounders created a workaround to stay on the market, selling new formulations as “personalized” compounded GLP-1 drugs as microdoses and GLP-1s with added ingredients, like Vitamin B-12. However, these formulations were never tested in large clinical trials and have caused side effects, prompting NCL to issue a second alert summarizing the serious safety risks, including substandard drug potency, bacterial contamination, potentially harmful impurities, patient harm, and even death.

Yet, the exploitative market for unapproved compounded GLP-1 drugs is thriving, which is why the FDA has issued dozens of warning letters to online vendors making misleading equivalency or safety claims about these products. In April 2026, the FDA issued a proposed rule to exclude three GLP-1 drugs – semaglutide, tirzepatide, and liraglutide – from what is called the 503B bulks list. This development is significant because the rule makes clear that compounding is intended for limited purposes, not the permanent sale of mass-produced alternatives to FDA-approved medicines.

However, even with these developments, a new danger has emerged. The same regulatory loopholes that enabled the mass marketing of compounded GLP-1’s are now fueling the Wild West – a lucrative underground marketplace where “gray market vendors” sell consumers the active ingredients for semaglutide and tirzepatide and “research-grade” experimental peptides that are banned in Canada, Australia, the European Union, and by the World Anti-Doping Agency.

Gray markets refer to approved drugs being sold outside of legal channels, but this Wild West is also a black market selling unapproved drugs illegally. This is what has occurred with retatrutide, a potent weight loss drug currently undergoing clinical trials and not approved anywhere in the world, where cheap, illegal counterfeit versions sourced primarily from Chinese manufacturers are sold to consumers online in powdered form with dosing instructions.

Because black market drugs come with no guarantee of quality, purity, or dosing accuracy, global health bodies warn that knockoff retatrutide may contain substituted chemicals, toxic impurities, or completely different active compounds, resulting in serious adverse effects. This was confirmed recently when CBS News found that health problems reported to America’s Poison Centers about retatrutide surged to an average of 95 cases per month in early 2026, a 265% increase from late 2025.

Moreover, in June 2026, health authorities in Australia issued an urgent alert after multiple users of black-market retatrutide suffered from acute liver failure, major kidney injuries, and life-threatening changes in heart rate, with investigators raising the possibility that contaminants were responsible. This prompted NCL to issue a third safety alert, relaying the warnings from the FDA, the American Medical Association, and global health bodies that self-injecting research-grade peptides and experimental retatrutide is dangerous.

But warnings are insufficient to address this serious situation. While deceptive advertising of compounded GLP-1 drugs is rampant and out in the open, raw compounds and unregulated peptides are marketed through informal online channels, such as chat rooms and social media platforms, and users rely on social media tutorials and influencers for advice on where to buy the peptides and how to self-administer them. Thus, it is time to focus on social media platforms as a conduit fueling the gray and black markets for unapproved GLP-1 drugs and research peptides sold outside regulated medical channels.

Already, a November 2025 Reuters report brought to light how Meta generated roughly
$7 billion in annualized sales from so-called “higher risk” scam ads and allowed AI-generated misleading marketing of weight loss products on Facebook, Instagram, and other Meta platforms that violated Meta’s policies for fraudulent content. But Meta is the tip of the iceberg. Across platforms such as TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, Telegram, and Discord, unapproved and potentially harmful peptides are being promoted as shortcuts to weight loss, body enhancement, and longevity.

Demonstrating the extent of the problem, a study published in JAMA found more than 130,000 Instagram posts and over 230 million TikTok views of content promoting illicit injectable peptides as of May 2026. This is significant in light of a May 2026 study conducted by Sunlight, a telehealth company, which found that nearly half (45 percent) of peptide users purchasing these compounds via social media required treatment at a hospital emergency room due to experiencing severe reactions.

Of equal concern, Eli Lilly and Company, the company conducting clinical trials to bring retatrutide to market, has reported to regulatory authorities more than 14,000 websites, advertisements, social media posts and product listings that unlawfully market retatrutide in over 100 countries via internet service providers, social media platforms, and e-commerce companies. The company’s warning – that the so-called retatrutide now being sold on the black market is not a medicine but an unverified, risky substance – is playing out in reports of people being seriously harmed. For example, in mid-September, Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration revealed that a patient suffered a torn esophagus after using an unapproved weight loss peptide labeled as retatrutide.

The good news is that the FDA is acting against online sellers of illicit weight-loss drugs, including retatrutide. But the scale of the problem requires a coordinated response from the FDA, Federal Trade Commission, customs agencies, and state and federal law enforcement, as well as action by social media platforms to stop facilitating gray- and black-market sales of potentially unsafe, unapproved drugs.

To that end, NCL joins the patient safety community in urging social media platforms to be part of the solution. This means working with agencies like the FDA and state attorneys general to share intelligence and to take proactive steps, such as using proactive AI detection, banning coded terms used to promote illicit products, blocking searches for unapproved compounds, and permanently banning sellers who advertise gray- or black-market drugs and redirect buyers to encrypted messaging apps to complete illegal sales.

National Consumers League to Convene Experts on AI, Fraud, and Healthcare at Two-Day Conference

Featuring expert panelists from Amazon, TRM Labs, the D.C. Office of the Attorney General, Reset Tech, the Center for Democracy & Technology, Eli Lilly and Company, PhRMA, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, KFF, AHIP, the National Organization for Rare Disorders, and George Washington University

Media Contact: Lisa McDonald, Vice President of Communications, 202-207-2829

Washington, DC – The National Consumers League (NCL) will bring together policymakers, consumer advocates, healthcare professionals, technology leaders, and innovators for “The Future of Trust: Artificial Intelligence in Fraud & Healthcare,” a two-day conference, September 23-34, examining how artificial intelligence is reshaping two areas with significant consequences for consumers: fraud and healthcare. RSVP here.

Day one is focused on AI and Consumer Fraud with a keynote address from Patrick Coughlin, author of Dark Side of the Boom: How Scammers Hijacked the AI Revolution, and panelist experts from Amazon, TRM Labs, the D.C. Office of the Attorney General, Reset Tech, and the Center for Democracy & Technology, who will examine the rapidly evolving AI fraud landscape and strategies for protecting consumers.

“The spread of AI-enabled fraud is revolutionizing scammers’ ability to reach millions of vulnerable consumers,” said John Breyault, NCL’s VP of Public Policy, Telecommunications, and Fraud. “This conference brings together the brightest minds in technology, consumer protection, and public policy to discuss real-world solutions that can help reduce consumers’ risk to the growing wave of AI-fueled fraud.”

Day two is focused on AI and Healthcare with a keynote address from Dr. Vin Gupta, Senior Medical Analyst at MS NOW, and panelists from Eli Lilly and Company, PhRMA, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, KFF, AHIP, the National Organization for Rare Disorders and George Washington University, among others.

“AI has the potential to transform healthcare—from accelerating the discovery of new treatments to improving how patients access, navigate, and manage their care,” said Lisa Bercu, NCL’s Senior Director of Health Policy. “But realizing that promise will depend on earning and maintaining consumer trust. As AI becomes more deeply embedded in healthcare, consumers need confidence that these technologies are accurate, their data is protected, and important decisions about their health are made with appropriate transparency and accountability.”

For the full conference program and registration, visit here.

###

About the National Consumers League (NCL)     

The National Consumers League, founded in 1899, is America’s pioneer consumer organization. Our mission is to protect and promote social and economic justice for consumers and workers in the United States and abroad. For more information, visit www.nclnet.org.

LIV Golf Schadenfreude

By NCL CEO, Sally Greenberg

I read a headline today that I found very satisfying – and I felt bad that it made me happy.

“LIV Golf has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. It is $500 million in debt, part of its goal to revive the league without Saudi funding.”

What I was experiencing was classic schadenfreude, or “feeling pleasure or joy or satisfaction when something bad happens to someone else.” But I believe that in this case, it’s deserved.

I took the Saudi invasion of US golf personally. I love the game:  I love to play, watch, and I love going to tournaments – seeing golfers’ perfect shots up close is thrilling.

Some context. In June 2022, the Saudi government announced they would launch a men’s golf league to compete with the PGA. LIV promised to pay nine-figure signing bonuses to lure away top names from the men’s tour. I was disgusted that so many pro golfers let greed lure them, including top player Phil Mickelson, who acknowledged that the Saudis threw gay men off buildings and murdered a Washington Post journalist. Still, he was signing with them anyway. “used words I sincerely regret” in a recently published interview in which the six-time major winner described the Saudi regime as “scary motherf******” and brushed aside known human rights violations, including the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi.

What does LIV pulling the plug have to do with US consumers? Well, power and money are corrupting influences – it showed up in LIV golf, and it shows up in US elections and with the explosion of billionaires in the US – which now has a record 989 billionaires according to the Forbes Billionaires List. Many of the super-rich are using their money to try to buy elections – Elon Musk poured $291 million into Republican candidates, political action committees, and other outside spending organizations in the 2024 election cycle. And Musk was not alone, according to analysis by OpenSecrets.

The other top six political donors gave $100 million or more, and all supported Republican candidates and causes.

The big money far more often goes to candidates who support weakening safety, environmental, and financial regulations, none of which is good for consumers. And controlling content on their tech platforms and resisting regulation for privacy, allowing blatant fraud, violent and hateful messaging, and because it attracts more eyeballs, resisting the call to take it down.

Back to LIV golf collapsing. When in 2022 the Saudis poured billions into US golf and tried to steal the sport with their riches, it seemed like a reiteration of what we are seeing across America –and that is not good. But now LIV has collapsed, and the players who fell for the promise of many millions are now “creditors”. Ie., they will never see the millions they were promised and now have to crawl back to the PGA and hope they can get back on the tour.

Unlimited riches – like what the Saudis have and so too almost a million US billionaires – are dangerous for democracy. But sometimes the bottom falls out even for them. Call it gloating, call it schadenfreude. Either way, it feels like justice.

Consumer Organizations Urge Congress to Protect Robust Tailpipe Emission Standards, Alleviate Pain at the Pump

Media Contact: Lisa McDonald, Vice President of Communications, 202-207-2829

Washington, DC — The National Consumers League, Consumer Federation of America, and 24 other public interest organizations sent a letter to House and Senate leadership urging members of Congress to oppose resolutions that would invalidate robust tailpipe emission standards adopted in full or in part by 18 states and the District of Columbia.

“Costs are low when tailpipe emission standards are high,” the letter states.  “The fewer pollutants that may be emitted, the less gasoline must be consumed.  These savings are substantial, as households spend approximately $2,800, or 3.7 percent of household budgets, on gasoline each year.”

Improvements in clean vehicle technology since 2002 save owners of 2024 light trucks and SUVs $9,920 in avoided gasoline expenditures over the vehicle’s lifecycle, amounting to $834 in annual savings.  Owners’ of 2024 cars save $9,100 in avoided gasoline expenditures over the vehicle’s lifecycle, amounting to $650 in annual savings.

Further, clean vehicle features have had a minimal effect on vehicle prices.  Equipment upgrades—which include changes in clean vehicle technologies, comfort, convenience, durability, and nonmandatory safety improvements—account for only $3,040, or 13 percent, of the increase in average expenditures per new passenger vehicle since 2002.

“Weakening tailpipe emission standards will inflict more pain at the pump and exacerbate affordability challenges,” the letter continues.  “More pollutants result in more avoidable illnesses and deaths, exacerbating healthcare costs.”

The letter also asserts that “[a] cleaner fleet is a safer fleet, helping address the unacceptably high number of automobile fatalities and injuries on our nation’s roadways.”

“The American people do not have to choose between vehicle affordability and fuel efficiency, public health, and environmental stewardship,” the letter states.  “We encourage all members of Congress to oppose these improper CRA resolutions.”

A copy of the letter can be found HERE

Cosigners (26):  National Consumers League; Consumer Federation of America; Affordable Homeownership Foundation Inc.; American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE); America Walks; American Academy of Pediatrics; American Academy of Pediatrics, Arizona Chapter; American Academy of Pediatrics California Chapter 1; American Academy of Pediatrics, DC Chapter; American Academy of Pediatrics, Florida Chapter; American Academy of Pediatrics, Idaho Chapter; American Academy of Pediatrics, Maine Chapter; American Academy of Pediatrics, Virginia Chapter; Bicycle Alliance of Minnesota; Center for Auto Safety;

Center for Progressive Reform; Citizens Action Coalition of IN; Consumer Federation of California; Consumers for Auto Reliability and Safety; Earth Ethics, Inc.; Kids and Car Safety; National Center for Health Research; National Coalition for Safer Roads; New Jersey Citizen Action; Vision Zero Maine; Whirlwind Wheelchair International

### 

About the National Consumers League (NCL)      

The National Consumers League, founded in 1899, is America’s pioneer consumer organization. Our mission is to protect and promote social and economic justice for consumers and workers in the United States and abroad. For more information, visit www.nclnet.org.    

National Consumers League Welcomes the Appeals Court Ruling Backing FDA’s Decision to Remove GLP-1 Drugs from the Shortage List

Media Contact: Lisa McDonald, Vice President of Communications, 202-207-2829 

Washington, DC – As an organization focused on the safety of GLP-1 weight loss drugs, the National Consumers League welcomes the August 27 ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirming the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) decision to remove the popular GLP-1 weight loss drug semaglutide from its drug shortage list as lawful and correct.

The Court’s decision, which also applies to the FDA’s action removing tirzepatide from the shortage list, is especially important because it validates the legal framework for how the FDA regulates the sale of compounded drugs during shortage situations. Dating back to the passage of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act in 1977, this framework both allows compounders to produce temporary versions of commercially available drugs during shortages, but it also makes it illegal for the continued mass production and sale of compounded versions when the shortage has ended.

Yet, despite being in existence for almost 50 years, the framework for removing drugs from the shortage list was recently challenged, not because there are legal issues, but because the mass-marketing of compounded GLP-1s became big business for compounding pharmacies and direct-to-consumer telehealth platforms while the branded GLP-1 weight loss drugs were in short supply. In fact, in 2024, compounded versions accounted for an estimated 30% of the overall GLP-1 weight-loss market. Thus, the Outsourcing Facilities Association (OFA), an organization representing compounding pharmacies, sued the FDA for declaring an end to the shortages of semaglutide and tirzepatide, claiming the agency was “abruptly depriving patients of much needed treatment and artificially raising drug prices.”

Among OFA’s arguments were that the FDA ignored evidence that the shortages continued to exist, and that the agency did not give compounders reasonable notice of the planned determinations or allow them to weigh in with comments. But here is the good news: the Appeals Court reviewed the evidence and rejected these arguments, concluding that the FDA “followed the statutory framework, applying the statutory definition of shortage to the evidence before it.”

Importantly, the Court also endorsed FDA’s methodology and its reliance on actual supply data from the manufacturers to make the determination of the end of the shortage. Specifically, the Court declared that pharmacy screenshots, patient reports, articles, blog posts, and form letters submitted by compounders are less probative than “more specific, reliable, comprehensive, and current” data from the manufacturer – codifying common sense and the value of verifiable evidence.

At a time of growing concern over the need to improve the regulation of compounded drugs and restore compounding to its intended purpose, the Fifth Circuit’s ruling represents a line in the sand for policymakers and compounders. FDA’s time-tested regulatory framework for addressing shortage situations works and relies on a thorough review of the evidence that credits specific, reliable, comprehensive, and current information and data—up and down the product supply chain—over anecdotal, isolated, and unreliable reports.

### 

About the National Consumers League (NCL)      

The National Consumers League, founded in 1899, is America’s pioneer consumer organization. Our mission is to protect and promote social and economic justice for consumers and workers in the United States and abroad. For more information, visit www.nclnet.org.   

This Labor Day, Remember the Women Who Fought for the 40-Hour Workweek

By NCL CEO Sally Greenberg

Labor Day 2026 is around the corner, and fittingly, I was asked this week to join an important discussion about “Responsible Purchasing Practices,” hosted by the Fair Labor Association (FLA), on whose board I serve. It may sound like a niche topic, but the issue is anything but: for generations, workers have been pushed into exploitative conditions to meet relentless demand for goods.

Unrealistic deadlines, last-minute changes, low prices, and production demands can put enormous pressure on the factories and workers who make our products. Children too are often exploited in the supply chain, with low wages, forced labor, hazardous work conditions, and human trafficking.

Florence Kelley, NCL’s esteemed first General Secretary appointed in 1899, made responsible purchasing practices an issue early on. One example is her work with Edward Filene of Filene’s Department Store to encourage shoppers to buy not 2 days before the holidays but weeks before. They launched the campaign because workers – often shopgirls as young as 10 and 11 – could typically be required to work 12 hours a day or more behind counters until late in the evenings, especially during holiday crunch season.

The Filene’s campaign was launched decades before the adoption of the U.S. Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, which Frances Perkins, who was an acolyte of Florence Kelley and in 1932 became the Department of Labor Secretary under FDR, brought to fruition. The FLSA gave us maximum-hours laws, minimum wages, banned child labor, and required overtime pay beyond a 40-hour week. Ten and 12 hour days were not unusual, and often people worked 6-7 days a week. I talked about this fact on the panel this week – for 88 years, American workers – with a few categories unfortunately carved out and still lacking protections – have enjoyed the benefits of a 40-hour workweek. Workers around the world deserve the same.

The FLA’s program on Responsible Purchasing Practices shows that good RPPs remain a critical concern for workers around the globe – especially those who don’t enjoy broad labor law protections. Without limits on the demands manufacturers and retailers can make on workers to produce around the clock, suffering, exploitation, and misery will surely result.

The FLA is distinctive as a multistakeholder 501(c)(3) organization, bringing together universities, manufacturers, civil society organizations, and other stakeholders to advance laws, policies, and practices that promote safe and ethical working conditions. Responsible Purchasing Practices are central to that mission.

Florence Kelley understood that consumers also have a role to play in demanding decent working conditions for the people who make the goods they buy. When Filene’s and the National Consumers’ League launched their campaign, a central goal was to build that consumer awareness.

As significant as the Fair Labor Standards Act was for workers, NCL has spent decades working to close a major gap in its protections: the exemption affecting children who work on farms alongside their parents. In some states, that exemption can result in children working seven days a week without a guaranteed day of rest.

Poverty was—and remains—a major driver of child labor around the world. Early reformers understood that simply removing children from the workplace was not enough; families often depended on their earnings. Philanthropists therefore stepped in to help replace that lost income, making it possible for children to remain in school rather than at work.

That history helps explain why responsible purchasing practices matter today.

Consumers may see only the finished product on a store shelf or delivered to their homes. But behind every product are workers whose time and labor made it possible. Companies therefore have a responsibility to ensure that their purchasing practices do not encourage excessive overtime, unsafe conditions, or the erosion of basic labor standards.

More than 125 years after NCL was founded, the principle that guided Florence Kelley and Frances Perkins remains central to our work: consumers, companies, and policymakers all have a role to play in building an economy that respects workers and their rights.

We should also remember that the protections many workers enjoy today were hard-won. The eight-hour day, the 40-hour workweek, overtime protections, and restrictions on child labor did not simply appear. Generations of workers and reformers fought for them, often in the face of powerful opposition.

That struggle continues around the world. We are encouraged by recent progress in Mexico and Chile. Mexico recently enacted a constitutional amendment reducing the maximum workweek from 48 to 40 hours, with the reduction to be phased in between 2027 and 2030. Chile, meanwhile, is already implementing its own 40-hour workweek law. The maximum ordinary workweek fell from 44 to 42 hours on April 26, 2026, and will decline to 40 hours in 2028.

Labor Day reminds us not only of what workers have achieved, but also of how much work remains. Hundreds of millions of workers around the globe still lack meaningful protections, and Responsible Purchasing Practices are one important tool for addressing persistent labor abuses.

This Labor Day, let us celebrate American workers while remembering Florence Kelley, Frances Perkins, and the modern-day organizations—including NCL and the Fair Labor Association—that continue the fight for decent work, fair treatment, and meaningful protections for workers everywhere.

National Consumers League Urges FDA to Reject Petition Seeking Autism Warning on Children’s Acetaminophen

Media Contact: Lisa McDonald, Vice President of Communications, 202-207-2829 

Washington, DC – The National Consumers League (NCL) submitted comments to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) urging the agency to reject a citizen petition from Children’s Health Defense (CHD) seeking to remove over-the-counter acetaminophen products for children under two and require boxed warnings linking acetaminophen to autism spectrum disorder (ASD). 

“Parents need safe and effective options when their child is sick or in pain, and deserve reliable information they can trust,” said Lisa Bercu, NCL Senior Director of Health Policy. “Leading pediatric experts have been clear that the evidence does not establish that acetaminophen causes autism.  Removing products from the market or imposing a boxed warning could unnecessarily alarm families, discourage appropriate treatment, and leave parents with fewer options when their children are sick or in pain.”

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has stated plainly that decades of research support the safety of acetaminophen for children when administered as directed and that studies do not establish a causal link between acetaminophen use in children and Autism.

“Imposing a serious FDA warning, contrary to leading pediatric expert opinion and without sufficient evidence, could also undermine public confidence in the scientific integrity of FDA’s labeling decisions,” Bercu concluded. “For more than 70 years families have relied on acetaminophen to treat children’s pain and fever, and leading pediatric experts continue to recognize it as safe and effective when used as directed.”

NCL’s comments are available here.  

### 

About the National Consumers League (NCL)      

The National Consumers League, founded in 1899, is America’s pioneer consumer organization. Our mission is to protect and promote social and economic justice for consumers and workers in the United States and abroad. For more information, visit www.nclnet.org.